University of Waterloo

3.4M citations
110.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Waterloo

100.4k papers receiving 3.2M citations

Peers

University of Waterloo
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Automotive Engineering 117.2k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 539.5k
  • Artificial Intelligence 302.9k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 200.8k
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 31.6k
Replace Pennsylvania State University with:
Pennsylvania State University United States
The Ohio State University United States
University of Maryland, College Park United States
Carnegie Mellon University United States
Michigan State University United States
McMaster University Canada
University of Pittsburgh United States
Western University Canada
Virginia Tech United States
Purdue University West Lafayette United States
University of Waterloo relative to Pennsylvania State University United States Pennsylvania State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pennsylvania State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Waterloo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Waterloo. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Waterloo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Waterloo more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Waterloo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Waterloo at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Waterloo at the time of their publication.

About University of Waterloo

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Waterloo have published 110.5k papers, which have received a total of 3.4M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.1k papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 5.6k papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 7.7k papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 11.0k papers in Artificial Intelligence and 15.8k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Quantum Information and Cryptography (1.4k papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1.2k papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (1.2k papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (1.2k papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1.1k papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (1.1k papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (1.0k papers) and Algorithms and Data Compression (991 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Automotive Engineering (117.2k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (539.5k citations), Artificial Intelligence (302.9k citations), Computer Networks and Communications (200.8k citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (31.6k citations). Authors at University of Waterloo collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physical Review Letters, Optometry and Vision Science, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering and Physical Review A. Some of University of Waterloo's most productive authors include Bernard R. Glick, Linda F. Nazar, Xuemin Shen, Janusz Pawliszyn, Zhongwei Chen, Juewen Liu, Stuart M. McGill, Ehab F. El‐Saadany, Josef Paldus and Robert B. Mann.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact