Lancaster University

1.8M citations
50.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Lancaster University

44.6k papers receiving 1.6M citations

Peers

Lancaster University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Global and Planetary Change 126.3k
  • Soil Science 56.4k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 60.7k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 35.4k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 76.8k
Replace University of Nottingham with:
University of Nottingham United Kingdom
University of York United Kingdom
University of Southampton United Kingdom
University of Exeter United Kingdom
University of Glasgow United Kingdom
University of Reading United Kingdom
King's College London United Kingdom
Durham University United Kingdom
Cardiff University United Kingdom
University of Aberdeen United Kingdom
Lancaster University relative to University of Nottingham United Kingdom University of Nottingham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
University of Nottingham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Lancaster University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Lancaster University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Lancaster University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lancaster University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Lancaster University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Lancaster University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Lancaster University at the time of their publication.

About Lancaster University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Lancaster University have published 50.1k papers, which have received a total of 1.8M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 1.3k papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 2.4k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 935 papers in Statistics and Probability and 1.4k papers in Management Science and Operations Research on the topics of Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (725 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (698 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (655 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (607 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (580 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (550 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (546 papers) and Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (542 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (126.3k citations), Soil Science (56.4k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (60.7k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (35.4k citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (76.8k citations). Authors at Lancaster University collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Science & Technology, The Science of The Total Environment, European Journal of Operational Research, PLoS ONE and Physical Review Letters. Some of Lancaster University's most productive authors include Keith John Beven, Kevin Christopher Jones, Norman L. Fairclough, John Urry, Richard D. Bardgett, Alan R. Wellburn, Elizabeth Shove, William John Davies, David H. Lyth and Peter John Diggle.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact