University of Nottingham

4.2M citations
122.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Nottingham

108.7k papers receiving 3.8M citations

Peers

University of Nottingham
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Instrumentation 33.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 151.1k
  • Molecular Biology 502.5k
  • Strategy and Management 99.9k
  • Plant Science 241.2k
Replace University of Manchester with:
University of Manchester United Kingdom
University of Birmingham United Kingdom
Imperial College London United Kingdom
University of Sheffield United Kingdom
Cardiff University United Kingdom
University of Edinburgh United Kingdom
University of Bristol United Kingdom
University of Southampton United Kingdom
University of Oxford United Kingdom
KU Leuven Belgium
University of Nottingham relative to University of Manchester United Kingdom University of Manchester's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
University of Manchester · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Nottingham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Nottingham. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Nottingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Nottingham more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Nottingham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Nottingham at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Nottingham at the time of their publication.

About University of Nottingham

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Nottingham have published 122.7k papers, which have received a total of 4.2M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 6.3k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 3.8k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 1.1k papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 1.3k papers in Small Animals and 637 papers in Instrumentation on the topics of Multilevel Inverters and Converters (1.3k papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (1.1k papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (1.1k papers), Electric Motor Design and Analysis (1.1k papers), Advanced DC-DC Converters (1.0k papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1.0k papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (984 papers) and Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (775 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Instrumentation (33.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (151.1k citations), Molecular Biology (502.5k citations), Strategy and Management (99.9k citations) and Plant Science (241.2k citations). Authors at University of Nottingham collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Scientific Reports, BMJ Open and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Some of University of Nottingham's most productive authors include Zoltán Dörnyei, Mike Wright, R. Hill, Saffa Riffat, Paul M. Williams, Norbert Schmitt, Donald S. Siegel, Robert Mokaya, Jonathan W. Peirce and Alexander J. Blake.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact