University of York

54.8k papers receiving 2.3M citations

Peers

University of York
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Ecological Modeling 34.9k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 143.8k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 88.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81.5k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 69.2k
Replace University of Sheffield with:
University of Sheffield United Kingdom
University of Leeds United Kingdom
University of Birmingham United Kingdom
University of Bristol United Kingdom
University of Nottingham United Kingdom
University of Edinburgh United Kingdom
University of Manchester United Kingdom
University of Southampton United Kingdom
Newcastle University United Kingdom
Durham University United Kingdom
University of York relative to University of Sheffield United Kingdom University of Sheffield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
University of Sheffield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of York

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of York. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of York with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of York more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of York

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of York at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of York at the time of their publication.

About University of York

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of York have published 62.5k papers, which have received a total of 2.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 983 papers in Software, 3.1k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4.2k papers in Economics and Econometrics, 1.1k papers in Hardware and Architecture and 3.4k papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1.5k papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (926 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (816 papers), Real-Time Systems Scheduling (756 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (746 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (733 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (726 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (684 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (34.9k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (143.8k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (88.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81.5k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (69.2k citations). Authors at University of York collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Scientific Reports, Physical Review C and Atmospheric chemistry and physics. Some of University of York's most productive authors include Kevin D. Cowtan, Paul Emsley, Peter A. Lachenbruch, Jacob Cohen, Hilary Arksey, Lisa Jayne O'Malley, Alan Baddeley, ALASTAIR H. FITTER, Denis G. Pelli and James H. Clark.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact