King's College London

5.2M citations
142.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

King's College London

118.4k papers receiving 4.4M citations

Peers

King's College London
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Biological Psychiatry 62.6k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 365.9k
  • Clinical Psychology 428.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 319.8k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 48.6k
Replace University of Cambridge with:
University of Cambridge United Kingdom
University of Oxford United Kingdom
University College London United Kingdom
University of Manchester United Kingdom
Imperial College London United Kingdom
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique France
University of Amsterdam Netherlands
University of Bristol United Kingdom
KU Leuven Belgium
Université Paris Cité France
King's College London relative to University of Cambridge United Kingdom University of Cambridge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
University of Cambridge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at King's College London

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at King's College London. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at King's College London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites King's College London more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at King's College London

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with King's College London at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with King's College London at the time of their publication.

About King's College London

In recent decades, authors affiliated with King's College London have published 142.9k papers, which have received a total of 5.2M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8.8k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 9.1k papers in Clinical Psychology, 6.6k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 756 papers in Biological Psychiatry and 7.0k papers in Physiology on the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (3.0k papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1.8k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.7k papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1.6k papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (1.5k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.3k papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1.3k papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (1.3k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (62.6k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (365.9k citations), Clinical Psychology (428.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (319.8k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (48.6k citations). Authors at King's College London collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Nature, BMJ Open, Psychological Medicine and Scientific Reports. Some of King's College London's most productive authors include Barry Halliwell, Terrie E. Moffitt, Avshalom Caspi, Cedric E. Ginestet, Robert Goodman, N. Joan Abbott, Catherine Rice‐Evans, Carmine M. Pariante, Graham Thornicroft and John M.C. Gutteridge.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact