King's College London

4.7M citations
131.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

King's College London

120.3k papers receiving 4.6M citations

Peers

King's College London
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 438.8k
  • Biological Psychiatry 71.1k
  • Clinical Psychology 516.7k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 355.7k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 53.9k
Replace University of Oxford with:
University of Oxford United Kingdom
University of Cambridge United Kingdom
University College London United Kingdom
University of Manchester United Kingdom
Imperial College London United Kingdom
University of Amsterdam Netherlands
University of Bristol United Kingdom
KU Leuven Belgium
Radboud University Nijmegen Netherlands
University of Edinburgh United Kingdom
King's College London relative to University of Oxford United Kingdom University of Oxford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
University of Oxford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at King's College London

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at King's College London. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at King's College London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites King's College London more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at King's College London

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with King's College London at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with King's College London at the time of their publication.

About King's College London

In recent decades, authors affiliated with King's College London have published 131.2k papers, which have received a total of 4.7M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 11.4k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 12.5k papers in Clinical Psychology, 1.0k papers in Biological Psychiatry, 7.9k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 9.8k papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (4.0k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3.0k papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2.4k papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2.2k papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1.9k papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (1.8k papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1.6k papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1.6k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Psychiatry and Mental health (438.8k citations), Biological Psychiatry (71.1k citations), Clinical Psychology (516.7k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (355.7k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (53.9k citations). Authors at King's College London collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Nature, Psychological Medicine and Scientific Reports. Some of King's College London's most productive authors include Barry Halliwell, Terrie E. Moffitt, Cedric E. Ginestet, Avshalom Caspi, Robert Goodman, N. Joan Abbott, Catherine Rice‐Evans, Graham Thornicroft, John M.C. Gutteridge and Peter Jenner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact