James Madison University

7.2k papers receiving 178.2k citations

Peers

James Madison University
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • General Decision Sciences 3.1k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 12.0k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 14.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 13.9k
  • Social Psychology 21.9k
Replace William & Mary with:
William & Mary United States
University of Maryland, Baltimore County United States
Lehigh University United States
Old Dominion University United States
Kent State University United States
Binghamton University United States
Villanova University United States
American University United States
University of North Carolina at Charlotte United States
The Graduate Center, CUNY United States
James Madison University relative to William & Mary United States William & Mary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
William & Mary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at James Madison University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at James Madison University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at James Madison University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Madison University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at James Madison University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with James Madison University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with James Madison University at the time of their publication.

About James Madison University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with James Madison University have published 8.5k papers, which have received a total of 192.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 518 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 54 papers in General Psychology, 59 papers in Architecture, 757 papers in Social Psychology and 316 papers in Gender Studies on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (119 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (119 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (119 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (118 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (118 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (116 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (106 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (104 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (3.1k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (12.0k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (14.5k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (13.9k citations) and Social Psychology (21.9k citations). Authors at James Madison University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization and Journal of the Association for Information Systems. Some of James Madison University's most productive authors include Richard F. West, Keith E. Stanovich, Kenneth E. Barron, Judith M. Harackiewicz, Chris S. Hulleman, J. Barkley Rosser, Sara J. Finney, Maggie E. Toplak, Christine E. DeMars and Paul E. Bierly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact