James Madison University

194.9k citations
8.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Engineering Education and Pedagogy 132
    • Science Education and Pedagogy 114
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 83

James Madison University

7.6k papers receiving 194.7k citations

Peers

James Madison University
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • General Decision Sciences 3.8k
  • Computational Mathematics 613
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 11.1k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 5.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 7.6k
Replace William & Mary with:
William & Mary United States
Ohio University United States
University of Maryland, Baltimore County United States
Kent State University United States
Lehigh University United States
Old Dominion University United States
Binghamton University United States
Villanova University United States
Rochester Institute of Technology United States
George Mason University United States
James Madison University relative to William & Mary United States William & Mary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
William & Mary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at James Madison University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at James Madison University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at James Madison University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Madison University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at James Madison University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with James Madison University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with James Madison University at the time of their publication.

About James Madison University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with James Madison University have published 8.3k papers, which have received a total of 194.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 137 papers in Architecture, 876 papers in Education, 365 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 325 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 63 papers in Library and Information Sciences on the topics of Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (179 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (132 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (114 papers), Diverse Academia and Research Topics (102 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (98 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (90 papers), Design Education and Practice (84 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (83 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (3.8k citations), Computational Mathematics (613 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (11.1k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (5.2k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (7.6k citations). Authors at James Madison University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Journal of Business Research, PLoS ONE and Journal of Computer Information Systems. Some of James Madison University's most productive authors include Richard F. West, Keith E. Stanovich, Kenneth E. Barron, Judith M. Harackiewicz, Chris S. Hulleman, Sara J. Finney, J. Barkley Rosser, Maggie E. Toplak, Christine E. DeMars and William John Wales.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact