William & Mary

644.0k citations
20.4k papers ·

Impact in

  • Oceanography top 0.5%
    • Marine and coastal ecosystems
    • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
    • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Ecology top 1%
    • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Papers in

    • Marine and coastal ecosystems 677
    • Marine Biology and Ecology Research 659
  • Ecology 2.4k
    • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics 563

William & Mary

18.2k papers receiving 608.5k citations

Peers

William & Mary
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Oceanography 79.5k
  • Ecology 114.2k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 23.9k
  • Global and Planetary Change 72.6k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 30.6k
Replace University of Delaware with:
University of Delaware United States
Old Dominion University United States
University of Maryland, Baltimore County United States
University of Massachusetts Amherst United States
University of Waterloo Canada
City University of New York United States
Syracuse University United States
George Mason University United States
University of Maryland, College Park United States
City College of New York United States
William & Mary relative to University of Delaware United States University of Delaware's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Delaware · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at William & Mary

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at William & Mary. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at William & Mary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William & Mary more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at William & Mary

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with William & Mary at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with William & Mary at the time of their publication.

About William & Mary

In recent decades, authors affiliated with William & Mary have published 20.4k papers, which have received a total of 644.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Oceanography, 2.4k papers in Ecology, 1.1k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1.6k papers in Global and Planetary Change and 508 papers in Earth-Surface Processes on the topics of Marine and fisheries research (708 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (682 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (677 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (670 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (659 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (621 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (608 papers) and Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (563 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oceanography (79.5k citations), Ecology (114.2k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (23.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (72.6k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (30.6k citations). Authors at William & Mary collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Linear Algebra and its Applications, Physical Review Letters, Marine Ecology Progress Series, Physical review. D and Physics Letters B. Some of William & Mary's most productive authors include Megan Tschannen‐Moran, Charles R. Johnson, Robert J. Díaz, J. Emmett Duffy, Roger A. Horn, John B. Nezlek, Jonathan S. Lefcheck, Robert J. Orth, Henry Krakauer and Anita Woolfolk Hoy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact