Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom)
Impact in
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
- Family Practice top 5%
Papers in
- Top scholars
- Andrew LloydXavier Badı́aPaul KindClaire GudexMichael HerdmanD WildCharles A. MarottaM.H.M. Janssen
- Journals
- Value in Health (137 papers)Journal of Medical Economics (80 papers)PharmacoEconomics (47 papers)Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy (43 papers)Advances in Therapy (33 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom)
1.8k papers receiving 54.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
- Internal Medicine 1.5k
- Family Practice 708
- Psychiatry and Mental health 5.1k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.0k
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 4.0k
Countries citing scholars working at Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication.
About Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) have published 2.3k papers, which have received a total of 72.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 28 papers in Family Practice, 17 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 127 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 29 papers in Internal Medicine and 131 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (197 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (80 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (78 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (66 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (51 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (44 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (40 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (33 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Internal Medicine (1.5k citations), Family Practice (708 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (5.1k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.0k citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (4.0k citations). Authors at Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Value in Health, Journal of Medical Economics, PharmacoEconomics, Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy and Advances in Therapy. Some of Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom)'s most productive authors include Andrew Lloyd, Xavier Badı́a, Paul Kind, Claire Gudex, Michael Herdman, D Wild, Charles A. Marotta, M.H.M. Janssen, Gouke J. Bonsel and David Parkin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.