Imperial Consultants

392 papers receiving 13.5k citations

Peers

Imperial Consultants
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 1.4k
  • Pollution 839
  • Polymers and Plastics 917
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 3.5k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 995
Replace Renewable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) with:
Renewable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
UK Energy Research Centre United Kingdom
World Energy Council United Kingdom
European Institute for Energy Research Germany
Cheltenham Festivals United Kingdom
National Renewable Energy Centre Spain
Belfast City Council United Kingdom
Institut für Energie- und Umwelttechnik Germany
Air Liquide (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Directorate-General for Energy Belgium
Imperial Consultants relative to Renewable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) United Kingdom Renewable Energy Systems (United Kingdom)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Renewable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Imperial Consultants

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Imperial Consultants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Imperial Consultants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imperial Consultants more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Imperial Consultants

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Imperial Consultants at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Imperial Consultants at the time of their publication.

About Imperial Consultants

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Imperial Consultants have published 477 papers, which have received a total of 15.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 12 papers in Statistics and Probability, 34 papers in Oncology, 14 papers in Hematology, 15 papers in Pollution and 33 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (20 papers), Rock Mechanics and Modeling (11 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (10 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (10 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (9 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (9 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (8 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Energy Engineering and Power Technology (1.4k citations), Pollution (839 citations), Polymers and Plastics (917 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (3.5k citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (995 citations). Authors at Imperial Consultants collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Value in Health, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Current Medical Research and Opinion, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. Some of Imperial Consultants's most productive authors include Adam Hawkes, Ajay Gambhir, Oliver Schmidt, Iain Staffell, John A. Hudson, Ana Claudia Arias, Iain McCulloch, J. D. MacKenzie, Alberto Salleo and Jonathan Rivnay.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact