Journal of Medical Economics

2.2k papers and 27.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Journal of Medical Economics in the last decades have received a total of 27.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Medical Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (553 papers), Epidemiology (356 papers) and Surgery (305 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (449 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (124 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (116 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Medical Economics are Paul C. Langley, Torsten Christensen, Jonathan Belsey, Onur Başer, Eric Q. Wu, Annie Guérin, Jay Lin, Kathleen F. Villa, Stephen P. McKenna and Howard G. Birnbaum.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Medical Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Medical Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Medical Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Medical Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Medical Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Medical Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Medical Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025