PharmacoEconomics

3.3k papers and 100.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.3k papers published in PharmacoEconomics in the last decades have received a total of 100.8k indexed citations. Papers published in PharmacoEconomics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.7k papers), General Health Professions (561 papers) and Epidemiology (384 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1.6k papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (571 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (378 papers). The most active scholars publishing in PharmacoEconomics are Andrew Briggs, Frank B. Hu, Adela Hruby, Mark Sculpher, John Brazier, Emily Lancsar, Arthur S. Zbrozek, Margaret C. Reilly, Ellen Dukes and Karl Claxton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in PharmacoEconomics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in PharmacoEconomics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in PharmacoEconomics.

Countries where authors publish in PharmacoEconomics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in PharmacoEconomics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in PharmacoEconomics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PharmacoEconomics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025