Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Food Science top 10%
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Papers in
- Food Science 223
- Food Industry and Aquatic Biology 85
- Biochemistry 57
- Top scholars
- Ralf GreinerBertrand MatthäusU. KonietznyGerhard RechkemmerWilhelm H. HolzapfelHana ValentaV. A. TutelyanDmitry Olegovich Bokov
- Journals
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences (19 papers)European Food Research and Technology (11 papers)European Journal of Nutrition (10 papers)Journal of Food Science (9 papers)Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine (66 papers)
- Partner nations
- RussiaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology
1.0k papers receiving 16.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
- Biochemistry 1.4k
- Food Science 3.8k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 2.8k
- Plant Science 3.5k
- Animal Science and Zoology 928
Countries citing scholars working at Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology at the time of their publication.
About Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 16.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 223 papers in Food Science, 57 papers in Biochemistry, 146 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics, 183 papers in Physiology and 126 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health on the topics of Human Health and Disease (118 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (96 papers), Food Industry and Aquatic Biology (85 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (65 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (63 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (51 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (47 papers) and Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biochemistry (1.4k citations), Food Science (3.8k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (2.8k citations), Plant Science (3.5k citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (928 citations). Authors at Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology collaborate with scholars in Russia, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Molecular Sciences, European Food Research and Technology, European Journal of Nutrition, Journal of Food Science and Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. Some of Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology's most productive authors include Ralf Greiner, Bertrand Matthäus, U. Konietzny, Gerhard Rechkemmer, Wilhelm H. Holzapfel, Hana Valenta, V. A. Tutelyan, Dmitry Olegovich Bokov, Klaus‐Dieter Jany and Henry Delincée.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.