Economic Research Service

76.9k citations
3.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Economic Research Service

2.9k papers receiving 76.9k citations

Peers

Economic Research Service
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11.4k
  • Economics and Econometrics 18.1k
  • Safety Research 7.7k
  • Soil Science 4.7k
  • General Health Professions 6.4k
Replace World Bank Group with:
World Bank Group United States
International Food Policy Research Institute United States
United Nations United States
Resources For The Future United States
United States Agency for International Development United States
Inter-American Development Bank United States
Brookings Institution United States
United Nations Children's Fund United States
United Nations Development Programme United States
Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies
Economic Research Service relative to World Bank Group United States World Bank Group's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
World Bank Group · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Economic Research Service

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Economic Research Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Economic Research Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economic Research Service more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Economic Research Service

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Economic Research Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Economic Research Service at the time of their publication.

About Economic Research Service

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Economic Research Service have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 76.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 527 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 733 papers in Safety Research, 1.1k papers in Economics and Econometrics, 158 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 174 papers in Soil Science on the topics of Agricultural economics and policies (710 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (565 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (233 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (185 papers), Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation (161 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (153 papers), Global trade and economics (122 papers) and Agricultural risk and resilience (84 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (11.4k citations), Economics and Econometrics (18.1k citations), Safety Research (7.7k citations), Soil Science (4.7k citations) and General Health Professions (6.4k citations). Authors at Economic Research Service collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Economics, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Food Policy and Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. Some of Economic Research Service's most productive authors include Keith O. Fuglie, Jean C. Buzby, Biing‐Hwan Lin, Ashok Kumar Mishra, Mark Nord, Jeremy Glenn Weber, Daniel Hellerstein, Joseph Cooper, Joanne F. Guthrie and Calvin L. Beale.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact