Policy Analysis (United States)
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Healthcare Policy and Management
Papers in
-
- Healthcare Policy and Management 162
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 109
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 97
- Gender Studies 209
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 144
- Top scholars
- Elinor OstromJohn CawleyGerry OsterDaniel T. LichterJohn EdelsbergDerek WeyckerChristopher WildemanRichard V. Burkhauser
- Journals
- Health Affairs (31 papers)Demography (31 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (26 papers)Value in Health (26 papers)Journal of Health Economics (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Policy Analysis (United States)
3.1k papers receiving 109.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
- Global and Planetary Change 16.1k
- Economics and Econometrics 20.6k
- Safety Research 6.2k
- General Health Professions 13.7k
- Public Administration 2.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Policy Analysis (United States)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Policy Analysis (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Policy Analysis (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Policy Analysis (United States) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Policy Analysis (United States)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Policy Analysis (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Policy Analysis (United States) at the time of their publication.
About Policy Analysis (United States)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Policy Analysis (United States) have published 3.8k papers, which have received a total of 129.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 848 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 209 papers in Gender Studies, 251 papers in Demography, 177 papers in Safety Research and 439 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (162 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (144 papers), Global Health Care Issues (113 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (109 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (108 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (103 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (97 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (90 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (16.1k citations), Economics and Econometrics (20.6k citations), Safety Research (6.2k citations), General Health Professions (13.7k citations) and Public Administration (2.1k citations). Authors at Policy Analysis (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Health Affairs, Demography, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Value in Health and Journal of Health Economics. Some of Policy Analysis (United States)'s most productive authors include Elinor Ostrom, John Cawley, Gerry Oster, Daniel T. Lichter, John Edelsberg, Derek Weycker, Christopher Wildeman, Richard V. Burkhauser, Chad D. Meyerhoefer and Marco A. Janssen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.