International Food Policy Research Institute
Impact in
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Soil Science top 0.5%
- Agricultural risk and resilience
Papers in
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices 687
- Soil Science 902
- Agricultural risk and resilience 642
- Top scholars
- Marie T. RuelAgnes QuisumbingClaudia RinglerXiaobo ZhangMark W. RosegrantDerek HeadeyHowarth E. BouisJohn Hoddinott
- Journals
- Agricultural Economics (222 papers)World Development (215 papers)Food Policy (207 papers)Journal of Nutrition (140 papers)American Journal of Agricultural Economics (112 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
International Food Policy Research Institute
4.4k papers receiving 178.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34.9k
- Soil Science 31.3k
- Business and International Management 5.9k
- Safety Research 20.4k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 31.4k
Countries citing scholars working at International Food Policy Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at International Food Policy Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at International Food Policy Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Food Policy Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at International Food Policy Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with International Food Policy Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with International Food Policy Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About International Food Policy Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with International Food Policy Research Institute have published 5.0k papers, which have received a total of 196.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.0k papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 902 papers in Soil Science, 174 papers in Business and International Management, 711 papers in Safety Research and 896 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics on the topics of Child Nutrition and Water Access (856 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (687 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (669 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (642 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (405 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (346 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (306 papers) and Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (246 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (34.9k citations), Soil Science (31.3k citations), Business and International Management (5.9k citations), Safety Research (20.4k citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (31.4k citations). Authors at International Food Policy Research Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Agricultural Economics, World Development, Food Policy, Journal of Nutrition and American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Some of International Food Policy Research Institute's most productive authors include Marie T. Ruel, Agnes Quisumbing, Claudia Ringler, Xiaobo Zhang, Mark W. Rosegrant, Derek Headey, Howarth E. Bouis, John Hoddinott, Ruth Meinzen‐Dick and Shenggen Fan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.