Resources For The Future

119.0k citations
2.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Resources For The Future

2.4k papers receiving 109.9k citations

Peers

Resources For The Future
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Economics and Econometrics 54.9k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 22.5k
  • Global and Planetary Change 21.8k
  • General Decision Sciences 1.8k
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 8.7k
Replace World Bank Group with:
World Bank Group United States
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars United States
International Food Policy Research Institute United States
Brookings Institution United States
Center for Global Development United States
Economic Research Service United States
Policy Analysis (United States) United States
Center for Economic and Policy Research United States
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science United States
United Nations United States
Resources For The Future relative to World Bank Group United States World Bank Group's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
World Bank Group · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Resources For The Future

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Resources For The Future. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Resources For The Future with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Resources For The Future more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Resources For The Future

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Resources For The Future at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Resources For The Future at the time of their publication.

About Resources For The Future

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Resources For The Future have published 2.7k papers, which have received a total of 119.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Economics and Econometrics, 661 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 54 papers in General Decision Sciences, 504 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 16 papers in General Energy on the topics of Climate Change Policy and Economics (745 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (557 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (557 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (275 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (135 papers), Forest Management and Policy (122 papers), Housing Market and Economics (117 papers) and Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (114 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Economics and Econometrics (54.9k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (22.5k citations), Global and Planetary Change (21.8k citations), General Decision Sciences (1.8k citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (8.7k citations). Authors at Resources For The Future collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Science, Energy Policy and Environmental and Resource Economics. Some of Resources For The Future's most productive authors include Robert N. Stavins, Richard G. Newell, Wallace E. Oates, Karen Palmer, Ian Parry, Paul R. Portney, Adam B. Jaffe, Carolyn Fischer, William A. Pizer and Lawrence H. Goulder.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact