United Nations

3.2k papers receiving 68.7k citations

Peers

United Nations
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Development 2.0k
  • Business and International Management 1.1k
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3.7k
  • Economics and Econometrics 9.4k
  • Strategy and Management 5.3k
Replace Policy Analysis (United States) with:
Policy Analysis (United States) United States
Hofstra University United States
Center for Global Development United States
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center United States
University of Richmond United States
State Street (United States) United States
St. John's University United States
Baruch College United States
Suffolk University United States
In-Q-Tel United States
United Nations relative to Policy Analysis (United States) United States Policy Analysis (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Policy Analysis (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United Nations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Nations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Nations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Nations more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United Nations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Nations at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Nations at the time of their publication.

About United Nations

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Nations have published 4.2k papers, which have received a total of 79.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 166 papers in Development, 295 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 778 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 892 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 491 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of International Law and Human Rights (227 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (208 papers), International Development and Aid (160 papers), Global trade and economics (151 papers), Human Rights and Development (102 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (97 papers), International Maritime Law Issues (90 papers) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (86 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Development (2.0k citations), Business and International Management (1.1k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (3.7k citations), Economics and Econometrics (9.4k citations) and Strategy and Management (5.3k citations). Authors at United Nations collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, American Journal of International Law, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, World Development and Food and Nutrition Bulletin. Some of United Nations's most productive authors include David Le Blanc, Erwin Danneels, Wim Naudé, Larry L. Tieszen, Chandra Giri, Zhiliang Zhu, Ajay Singh, Jan Eliasson, N. S. Scrimshaw and John Paul SanGiovanni.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact