Center for Global Development

128.9k citations
4.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Center for Global Development

3.4k papers receiving 113.9k citations

Peers

Center for Global Development
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Development 9.3k
  • Business and International Management 2.8k
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9.8k
  • Economics and Econometrics 28.6k
  • Safety Research 7.5k
Replace Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars with:
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars United States
United Nations United States
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center United States
University of Richmond United States
Brookings Institution United States
In-Q-Tel United States
Wilfrid Laurier University Canada
RTI International United States
Baruch College United States
Policy Analysis (United States) United States
Center for Global Development relative to Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars United States Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Center for Global Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for Global Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for Global Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for Global Development more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Center for Global Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for Global Development at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for Global Development at the time of their publication.

About Center for Global Development

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for Global Development have published 4.3k papers, which have received a total of 128.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 303 papers in Development, 303 papers in Safety Research, 293 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 851 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 298 papers in Finance on the topics of International Development and Aid (299 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (286 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (201 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (178 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (148 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (123 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (123 papers) and Global trade and economics (116 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Development (9.3k citations), Business and International Management (2.8k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (9.8k citations), Economics and Econometrics (28.6k citations) and Safety Research (7.5k citations). Authors at Center for Global Development collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Oncology, World Development, The Journal of Development Studies, Bylye Gody and BMJ Global Health. Some of Center for Global Development's most productive authors include David Roodman, William Easterly, Richard Heeks, Uma Kothari, Michael A. Clemens, Jenny C. Aker, Bill Cooke, Arvind Subramanian, David Hulme and Lant Pritchett.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact