Civil Aerospace Medical Institute

404 papers receiving 8.7k citations

Peers

Civil Aerospace Medical Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 222
  • Immunology and Allergy 786
  • Toxicology 382
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 546
  • Chemical Health and Safety 48
  • Hematology 695
Replace Oklahoma City VA Medical Center with:
Oklahoma City VA Medical Center United States
Biomedical Research Foundation United States
Texas Neurology United States
Texas Health and Science University United States
Dallas Nephrology Associates United States
Sears Holdings (United States) United States
Cardiovascular Research Associates United States
MED Institute United States
Cooper Institute United States
Dayton Clinical Oncology Program United States
Civil Aerospace Medical Institute relative to Oklahoma City VA Medical Center United States Oklahoma City VA Medical Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×48×
Oklahoma City VA Medical Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Civil Aerospace Medical Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Civil Aerospace Medical Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Civil Aerospace Medical Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Civil Aerospace Medical Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Civil Aerospace Medical Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Civil Aerospace Medical Institute at the time of their publication.

About Civil Aerospace Medical Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Civil Aerospace Medical Institute have published 481 papers, which have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 25 papers in Toxicology, 97 papers in Social Psychology, 16 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 21 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty on the topics of Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (70 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (41 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (30 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (25 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (21 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (18 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (17 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Immunology and Allergy (786 citations), Toxicology (382 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (546 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (48 citations) and Hematology (695 citations). Authors at Civil Aerospace Medical Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. Some of Civil Aerospace Medical Institute's most productive authors include L. A. Witt, Richard I. Thackray, Robert D. Johnson, Alvin M. Revzin, William E. Collins, Russell J. Lewis, Rodger P. McEver, Lendell G. Nye, Dennis V. Canfield and Harvey J. Karten.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact