Dayton Clinical Oncology Program

12.0k citations
455 papers ·

Impact in

    • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
    • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
    • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Papers in

    • Cancer survivorship and care 9
    • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 8
    • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 7

Dayton Clinical Oncology Program

344 papers receiving 8.6k citations

Peers

Dayton Clinical Oncology Program
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Oncology 2.8k
  • General Decision Sciences 197
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 853
  • Immunology and Allergy 263
  • Surgery 1.6k
Replace Burke Foundation with:
Burke Foundation United States
University of Tennessee System United States
Humana (United States) United States
Michigan Cancer Research Consortium United States
Northwood University United States
Anderson University - Indiana United States
University of St. Francis United States
Kelly Services (United States) United States
Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation United States
Smiths Detection (Canada) Canada
Dayton Clinical Oncology Program relative to Burke Foundation United States Burke Foundation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12.3×
Burke Foundation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Dayton Clinical Oncology Program

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Dayton Clinical Oncology Program. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Dayton Clinical Oncology Program with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dayton Clinical Oncology Program more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Dayton Clinical Oncology Program

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Dayton Clinical Oncology Program at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Dayton Clinical Oncology Program at the time of their publication.

About Dayton Clinical Oncology Program

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Dayton Clinical Oncology Program have published 455 papers, which have received a total of 12.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 47 papers in Oncology, 7 papers in Otorhinolaryngology, 65 papers in Surgery, 13 papers in Ophthalmology and 41 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (8 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (8 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (7 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (6 papers) and Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oncology (2.8k citations), General Decision Sciences (197 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (853 citations), Immunology and Allergy (263 citations) and Surgery (1.6k citations). Authors at Dayton Clinical Oncology Program collaborate with scholars in United States, Australia and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The American Journal of Surgery, Dermatologic Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Clinical journal of oncology nursing. Some of Dayton Clinical Oncology Program's most productive authors include Gary A. Klein, John P Sullivan, Douglas C. Tormey, Michael H. Veeder, Thomas R. Fleming, Phyllis J. Goodman, Charles G. Moertel, Daniel G. Haller, James A. Mailliard and John H. Glick.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact