Beijing Botanical Garden

10.7k citations
393 papers ·

Impact in

    • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
    • Plant Molecular Biology Research
    • Seed Germination and Physiology
    • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Papers in

Beijing Botanical Garden

381 papers receiving 10.7k citations

Peers

Beijing Botanical Garden
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Plant Science 4.4k
  • Biochemistry 498
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
  • Molecular Biology 3.4k
  • Biochemistry 208
Replace Novogene Bioinformatics Institute with:
Novogene Bioinformatics Institute China
China National Botanical Garden
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for the Research and Utilization of Plant Resources China
Shanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center China
Sweet Potato Research Institute China
Tasly Holding Group (China) China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils China
Beijing Vocational College of Agriculture China
Lushan Botanical Garden China
Wuhan Academy of Agricultural Sciences China
Beijing Botanical Garden relative to Novogene Bioinformatics Institute China Novogene Bioinformatics Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
Novogene Bioinformatics Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Beijing Botanical Garden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Beijing Botanical Garden. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Beijing Botanical Garden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beijing Botanical Garden more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Beijing Botanical Garden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Beijing Botanical Garden at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Beijing Botanical Garden at the time of their publication.

About Beijing Botanical Garden

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Beijing Botanical Garden have published 393 papers, which have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 163 papers in Plant Science, 59 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 16 papers in Biochemistry, 120 papers in Molecular Biology and 18 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Plant Gene Expression Analysis (61 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (45 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (27 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (22 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (19 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (19 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (19 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (4.4k citations), Biochemistry (498 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations), Molecular Biology (3.4k citations) and Biochemistry (208 citations). Authors at Beijing Botanical Garden collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Frontiers in Plant Science, PLoS ONE, Scientia Horticulturae, Food Chemistry and BMC Plant Biology. Some of Beijing Botanical Garden's most productive authors include Liang‐Sheng Wang, Qingyan Shu, Yongzhen Pang, Shanshan Li, Yan-Jun Xu, Zheng‐An Liu, Tao Sang, Chao Xu, Lei Shi and Yongxiu Liu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact