Institute of Plant Protection
Impact in
- Insect Science top 0.2%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Plant Science top 1%
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Insect Pest Control Strategies
Papers in
- Insect Science 4.6k
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 2.5k
- Insect and Pesticide Research 1.6k
- Plant Science 7.5k
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 1.6k
- Plant Virus Research Studies 1.3k
- Insect Pest Control Strategies 979
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 862
- Top scholars
- Kongming WuKris A. G. WyckhuysFrancisco Sánchez‐BayoYongquan ZhengFengshou DongXueping ZhouGuirong WangXingang Liu
- Journals
- Plant Disease (521 papers)Pest Management Science (399 papers)Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (358 papers)PLoS ONE (306 papers)Journal of Integrative Agriculture (288 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
In The Last Decade
Institute of Plant Protection
11.9k papers receiving 222.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
- Insect Science 73.6k
- Plant Science 122.6k
- Endocrinology 6.9k
- Horticulture 1.3k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 23.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Plant Protection
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Plant Protection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Plant Protection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Plant Protection more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Plant Protection
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Plant Protection at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Plant Protection at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Plant Protection
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Plant Protection have published 13.3k papers, which have received a total of 234.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.6k papers in Insect Science, 7.5k papers in Plant Science, 517 papers in Endocrinology, 1.4k papers in Cell Biology and 1.6k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2.5k papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (1.9k papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (1.6k papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (1.6k papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1.3k papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (1.3k papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (979 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (862 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Insect Science (73.6k citations), Plant Science (122.6k citations), Endocrinology (6.9k citations), Horticulture (1.3k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (23.4k citations). Authors at Institute of Plant Protection collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Pakistan and have published in prestigious journals including Plant Disease, Pest Management Science, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, PLoS ONE and Journal of Integrative Agriculture. Some of Institute of Plant Protection's most productive authors include Kongming Wu, Kris A. G. Wyckhuys, Francisco Sánchez‐Bayo, Yongquan Zheng, Fengshou Dong, Xueping Zhou, Guirong Wang, Xingang Liu, Fanghao Wan and Yanhui Lu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.