State Forestry and Grassland Administration

85.1k citations
7.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

State Forestry and Grassland Administration

6.2k papers receiving 80.2k citations

Peers

State Forestry and Grassland Administration
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Soil Science 7.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 8.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 14.3k
  • Plant Science 22.7k
  • Ecology 15.1k
Replace Research Institute of Forestry with:
Research Institute of Forestry China
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University China
Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture China
Hebei Agricultural University China
Chinese Academy of Forestry China
Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences China
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs China
Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology China
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning China
Henan Agricultural University China
State Forestry and Grassland Administration relative to Research Institute of Forestry China Research Institute of Forestry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Research Institute of Forestry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at State Forestry and Grassland Administration

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at State Forestry and Grassland Administration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at State Forestry and Grassland Administration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites State Forestry and Grassland Administration more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at State Forestry and Grassland Administration

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with State Forestry and Grassland Administration at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with State Forestry and Grassland Administration at the time of their publication.

About State Forestry and Grassland Administration

In recent decades, authors affiliated with State Forestry and Grassland Administration have published 7.3k papers, which have received a total of 85.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1000 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 617 papers in Soil Science, 1.3k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 260 papers in Ecological Modeling and 1.5k papers in Ecology on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (551 papers), Forest ecology and management (493 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (460 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (459 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (435 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (421 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (420 papers) and Bamboo properties and applications (358 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Soil Science (7.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (8.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (14.3k citations), Plant Science (22.7k citations) and Ecology (15.1k citations). Authors at State Forestry and Grassland Administration collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Forests, Frontiers in Plant Science, Remote Sensing, Industrial Crops and Products and The Science of The Total Environment. Some of State Forestry and Grassland Administration's most productive authors include Weisheng Zeng, Yingchun Liu, Hui Lin, Yujian Li, Edna C. Too, Meng Zhang, Zhengjun Shi, Benhua Fei, Ge Wang and Gregory S. Miller.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact