Chinese Academy of Forestry

243.9k citations
13.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Chinese Academy of Forestry

11.9k papers receiving 234.3k citations

Peers

Chinese Academy of Forestry
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Soil Science 22.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 28.0k
  • Global and Planetary Change 41.9k
  • Polymers and Plastics 24.3k
  • Plant Science 63.6k
Replace Beijing Forestry University with:
Beijing Forestry University China
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs China
State Forestry and Grassland Administration China
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences China
Institute of Botany China
Nanjing Forestry University China
Institute of Oceanology China
Shandong Agricultural University China
Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology China
Zhejiang A & F University China
Chinese Academy of Forestry relative to Beijing Forestry University China Beijing Forestry University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Beijing Forestry University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Chinese Academy of Forestry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Chinese Academy of Forestry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Chinese Academy of Forestry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Academy of Forestry more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Chinese Academy of Forestry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Chinese Academy of Forestry at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Chinese Academy of Forestry at the time of their publication.

About Chinese Academy of Forestry

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Chinese Academy of Forestry have published 13.0k papers, which have received a total of 243.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.8k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 1.1k papers in Soil Science, 2.3k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 3.7k papers in Plant Science and 2.2k papers in Ecology on the topics of Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1.0k papers), Forest ecology and management (941 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (904 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (797 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (686 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (663 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (631 papers) and Remote Sensing in Agriculture (545 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Soil Science (22.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (28.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (41.9k citations), Polymers and Plastics (24.3k citations) and Plant Science (63.6k citations). Authors at Chinese Academy of Forestry collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Forests, Frontiers in Plant Science, Industrial Crops and Products, PLoS ONE and Forest Ecology and Management. Some of Chinese Academy of Forestry's most productive authors include Shirong Liu, Fuxiang Chu, Jianchun Jiang, Wenji Yu, He Liu, Xiaoqing Wang, Runguo Zang, Shibin Shang, Guangcai Chen and Chunpeng Wang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact