Research Institute of Forestry

56.9k citations
3.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Research Institute of Forestry

3.2k papers receiving 53.2k citations

Peers

Research Institute of Forestry
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Plant Science 24.7k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 5.2k
  • Soil Science 3.9k
  • Global and Planetary Change 7.0k
  • Horticulture 282
Replace State Forestry and Grassland Administration with:
State Forestry and Grassland Administration China
Beijing Botanical Garden China
Hebei Agricultural University China
Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences China
Shanxi Agricultural University China
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University China
Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection China
Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture China
Institute of Plant Protection China
Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences China
Research Institute of Forestry relative to State Forestry and Grassland Administration China State Forestry and Grassland Administration's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
State Forestry and Grassland Administration · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Research Institute of Forestry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Research Institute of Forestry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Research Institute of Forestry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Institute of Forestry more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Research Institute of Forestry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Research Institute of Forestry at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Research Institute of Forestry at the time of their publication.

About Research Institute of Forestry

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Research Institute of Forestry have published 3.6k papers, which have received a total of 56.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.6k papers in Plant Science, 470 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 569 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 217 papers in Soil Science and 1.2k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Plant Molecular Biology Research (514 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (391 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (311 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (288 papers), Forest ecology and management (286 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (231 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (212 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (183 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (24.7k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (5.2k citations), Soil Science (3.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (7.0k citations) and Horticulture (282 citations). Authors at Research Institute of Forestry collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Forests, Frontiers in Plant Science, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Journal of Forestry Research and Industrial Crops and Products. Some of Research Institute of Forestry's most productive authors include Mengzhu Lu, Shougong Zhang, Liwang Qi, Aiguo Duan, Jianguo Zhang, Jin Zhang, Zhi‐Bin Luo, Dong Pei, Xiaojiao Han and Libing Wang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact