Yan Jin

52 papers receiving 809 citations

Peers

Yan Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Language and Linguistics 202
  • Literature and Literary Theory 176
  • Oral Surgery 60
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 110
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 100
Replace Thomas C. Cooper with:
Thomas C. Cooper United States
Karim Sadeghi Iran
Andile Mji South Africa
James S. Cole United States
Lisa Melonçon United States
Patrick L. Brown United States
Linda Christensen Denmark
Jason Parker United States
Hartmut Günther Brazil
William E. Cain United States
Yan Jin relative to Thomas C. Cooper United States Thomas C. Cooper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Thomas C. Cooper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Yan Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yan Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yan Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yan Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yan Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yan Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yan Jin. The network helps show where Yan Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Yan Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Yan Jin Line = papers co-authored together Yan Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201070
2 201468
3 201168
4 201355
5 200652
6 201946
7 201739
8 201837
9 201737
10 201627
11 201425
12 201725
13 201323
14 202123
15 202022
16 201721
17 200919
18 201516
19 201715
20
Fundamental Concerns in High-Stakes Language Testing: The Case of the College English Test.
201114

About Yan Jin

Yan Jin is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 55 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (14 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (14 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (11 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (4 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (3 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (3 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (3 papers) and Multilingual Education and Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (202 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (176 citations), Oral Surgery (60 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (110 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (100 citations). Yan Jin has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jason Fan, Ming Yan, Guoxing Yu, Zhenyan Gao, Chonghuai Yan, Weiwei Song, Bkc Chow, Liying Cheng, Ju Wang and Christine Doe. Their work appears in journals such as Language Testing, Language Testing in Asia, Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, Language Assessment Quarterly and Medical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact