W.W. de Jong
Impact in
-
- Connexins and lens biology
- Heat shock proteins research
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Retinal Development and Disorders
- Clinical Biochemistry top 10%
Papers in
-
- Connexins and lens biology 6
- Heat shock proteins research 3
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 1
- Oncology 3
- Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis 3
- Co-authors
- H. Bloemendal (8 shared papers)H.P.C. Driessen (4 shared papers)G. I. Tesser (4 shared papers)Paul Herbrink (1 shared paper)Wiljan Hendriks (2 shared papers)S. Sanyal (2 shared papers)Eviatar Nevo (2 shared papers)Hans Jansen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Molecular Biology and Evolution (1 paper)Analytical Biochemistry (1 paper)FEBS Letters (1 paper)Die Naturwissenschaften (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
W.W. de Jong
11 papers receiving 578 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Molecular Biology 470
- Clinical Biochemistry 39
- Cell Biology 83
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 32
- Paleontology 35
Countries citing papers authored by W.W. de Jong
This map shows the geographic impact of W.W. de Jong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.W. de Jong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.W. de Jong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W.W. de Jong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.W. de Jong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.W. de Jong. The network helps show where W.W. de Jong may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside W.W. de Jong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 189 | |
| 2 | 1981 | 105 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 104 | |
| 4 | The eye of the blind mole rat, Spalax ehrenbergi. Rudiment with hidden function? | 1990 | 83 |
| 5 | 1983 | 56 | |
| 6 | 1976 | 23 | |
| 7 | The eye of the blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi): regressive evolution at the molecular level. | 1990 | 14 |
| 8 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 0 |
About W.W. de Jong
W.W. de Jong is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Materials Chemistry, Cell Biology and Paleontology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (6 papers), Heat shock proteins research (3 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Calpain Protease Function and Regulation (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (470 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (39 citations), Cell Biology (83 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (32 citations) and Paleontology (35 citations). W.W. de Jong has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include H. Bloemendal, H.P.C. Driessen, G. I. Tesser, Paul Herbrink, Wiljan Hendriks, S. Sanyal, Eviatar Nevo, Hans Jansen, C. Slingsby and M. Bibby. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Analytical Biochemistry, FEBS Letters and Die Naturwissenschaften.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.