Molecular Biology and Evolution

7.7k papers and 849.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.7k papers published in Molecular Biology and Evolution in the last decades have received a total of 849.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Molecular Biology and Evolution usually cover Molecular Biology (5.1k papers), Genetics (3.4k papers) and Plant Science (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2.6k papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (1.8k papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Biology and Evolution are M Nei, Koichiro Tamura, Sudhir Kumar, Glen Stecher, Naruya Saitou, Kazutaka Katoh, Daron M. Standley, Yang Zhang, José Castresana and Alan Filipski.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Molecular Biology and Evolution

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Biology and Evolution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Biology and Evolution.

Countries where authors publish in Molecular Biology and Evolution

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Biology and Evolution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Biology and Evolution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Biology and Evolution more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025