Wolf Schmid

637 citations
45 papers · 225 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Wolf Schmid

20 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers

Wolf Schmid
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Literature and Literary Theory 108
  • Language and Linguistics 48
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 14
  • Classics 11
Replace Almuth Grésillon with:
Almuth Grésillon France
Tilmann Köppe Germany
Jane Stabler United Kingdom
Tom Kindt Switzerland
Craig Douglas Dworkin
Marina Tarlinskaja United States
Simone Winko Germany
Stefan Iversen Denmark
Julia Briggs United Kingdom
Gert Ueding Germany
Wolf Schmid relative to Almuth Grésillon France Almuth Grésillon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Almuth Grésillon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wolf Schmid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolf Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolf Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolf Schmid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolf Schmid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolf Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolf Schmid. The network helps show where Wolf Schmid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Wolf Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wolf Schmid Line = papers co-authored together Wolf Schmid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Narratology: An Introduction
201061
2 201455
3 200325
4 201021
5 197415
6 201410
7 20224
8
Emerging Vectors of Narratology
20173
9 19543
10 19733
11 19773
12 20172
13 20022
14 20172
15 20142
16 20142
17 19741
18 20141
19
Diachronic Narratology (the example of Ancient Greek narrative)
20131
20 19891

About Wolf Schmid

Wolf Schmid is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Cultural Studies, Education and Classics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Narrative Theory and Analysis (11 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (6 papers), Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (5 papers), Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication (4 papers), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (3 papers), Education, Literature, Philosophy Research (3 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (2 papers) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (108 citations), Language and Linguistics (48 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (46 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (14 citations) and Classics (11 citations). Wolf Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Frank, John H. Pier, Peter Hühn, Christian Gerhardt and Irene J. F. de Jong. Their work appears in journals such as The Slavic and East European Journal, Russian Literature, POETICA, Zeitschrift für Deutsches Altertum und Deutsche Literatur and Canadian Slavonic Papers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact