Jane Stabler
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Museology top 10%
- Historical Art and Culture Studies
Papers in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 5
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 4
-
- Philippine History and Culture 6
- Co-authors
- Martin H. Fischer (3 shared papers)Andrew Michael Roberts (3 shared papers)Maria Nella Carminati (2 shared papers)Alison Chapman (1 shared paper)Jane Austen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Wordsworth Circle (2 papers)Essays in Criticism (2 papers)Notes and Queries (1 paper)European Journal of English Studies (1 paper)Translation and Literature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Stabler
11 papers receiving 51 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Literature and Literary Theory 32
- Museology 8
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 25
- History 12
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Stabler
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Stabler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Stabler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Stabler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Stabler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Stabler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Stabler. The network helps show where Jane Stabler may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jane Stabler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 31 | |
| 2 | Unfolding the south : nineteenth-century British women writers and artists in Italy | 2003 | 11 |
| 3 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 0 |
About Jane Stabler
Jane Stabler is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy, having authored 19 papers that have together received 75 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philippine History and Culture (6 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (5 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers), Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis (2 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers) and Literature Analysis and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations), Museology (8 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (25 citations), History (12 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (14 citations). Jane Stabler has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martin H. Fischer, Andrew Michael Roberts, Maria Nella Carminati, Alison Chapman and Jane Austen. Their work appears in journals such as The Wordsworth Circle, Essays in Criticism, Notes and Queries, European Journal of English Studies and Translation and Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.