Countries where authors publish in Russian Literature
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Russian Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Russian Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Russian Literature more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Russian Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Russian Literature.
About Russian Literature
The 947 papers published in Russian Literature in the last decades have received a total of 945 indexed citations . Papers published in Russian Literature usually cover Cultural Studies (120 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (139 papers), Anthropology (81 papers), Language and Linguistics (72 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (32 papers) specifically the topics of Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (122 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (93 papers), Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication (67 papers), European Linguistics and Anthropology (54 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (52 papers), Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies (51 papers), Soviet and Russian History (41 papers) and Linguistics and language evolution (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Russian Literature are Irina Paperno, Hans Günther, Henryk Baran, Galin Tihanov, Wolf Schmid, A. Nilsson, Robert L. Jackson, Danuta Mendelson, Renate Lachmann and D. Barton Johnson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.