Almuth Grésillon

30 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers

Almuth Grésillon
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Linguistics and Language 44
  • Philosophy 89
  • Literature and Literary Theory 71
  • Language and Linguistics 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 31
Replace Nathalie Lacelle with:
Nathalie Lacelle Canada
Carol Sanders United Kingdom
Bertrand Daunay France
Olga Ragusa United States
María Victoria Spain
Paul Siblot France
Sylvain Auroux France
Josette Rey-Debove
Franz Josef Hausmann Germany
Francisco Alonso Almeida Spain
Almuth Grésillon relative to Nathalie Lacelle Canada Nathalie Lacelle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Nathalie Lacelle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Almuth Grésillon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Almuth Grésillon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Almuth Grésillon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Almuth Grésillon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Almuth Grésillon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Almuth Grésillon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Almuth Grésillon. The network helps show where Almuth Grésillon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Almuth Grésillon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Almuth Grésillon Line = papers co-authored together Almuth Grésillon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Éléments de critique génétique : lire les manuscrits modernes
199444
2 198444
3 200213
4 201412
5 198410
6 19889
7 19979
8 20058
9 19918
10 19808
11
Leçons d'écriture, ce que disent les manuscrits
19857
12 19756
13 20136
14 19865
15 19835
16
Analyse du Discours Langue Et Idéologies
19755
17 19924
18 19964
19 20153
20
La critique génétique: Origines et perspectives
20123

About Almuth Grésillon

Almuth Grésillon is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Computer Networks and Communications, Speech and Hearing and Language and Linguistics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (12 papers), Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (7 papers), History, Culture, and Society (5 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (4 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers), French Language Learning Methods (3 papers) and linguistics and terminology studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (44 citations), Philosophy (89 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (71 citations), Language and Linguistics (68 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (31 citations). Almuth Grésillon has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Dominique Maingueneau, Daniel Perrin, Michael Werner, Cathérine Fuchs, Paul Henry, Michel Pêcheux, Thierry Poibeau and Daniel Ferrer. Their work appears in journals such as Estudos Avançados, ˜L'œesprit créateur, Word & Image, Langages and Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact