Tilmann Köppe

443 citations
30 papers · 89 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Tilmann Köppe

21 papers receiving 65 citations

Peers

Tilmann Köppe
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Literature and Literary Theory 57
  • Language and Linguistics 24
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 24
  • Classics 5
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 6
Replace Wolf Schmid with:
Wolf Schmid Netherlands
Peter Michael Wetherill United Kingdom
Hans-Harald Müller Germany
Thomas Miller United States
Ulla Fix Germany
Jörg Schönert Finland
Sonia Rachele Piotti Italy
Andrew Kehoe United Kingdom
Haruo Shirane United States
Jurij Striedter
Tilmann Köppe relative to Wolf Schmid Netherlands Wolf Schmid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Wolf Schmid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tilmann Köppe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tilmann Köppe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tilmann Köppe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tilmann Köppe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tilmann Köppe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tilmann Köppe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tilmann Köppe. The network helps show where Tilmann Köppe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Tilmann Köppe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tilmann Köppe Line = papers co-authored together Tilmann Köppe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201123
2 201311
3 20168
4 20118
5 20156
6 20133
7 20083
8
Funktionen von Kunst
20093
9
Empirical Correlates of Narrative Closure
20162
10
Erzähltheorie, philosophisch [Tim Henning, Person sein und Geschichten erzählen. Eine Studie über personale Autonomie und narrative Gründe, 2009.]
20112
11 20162
12 20162
13 20112
14 20122
15 20231
16 20081
17 20141
18 20201
19 20071
20 20121

About Tilmann Köppe

Tilmann Köppe is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 30 papers that have together received 89 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Narrative Theory and Analysis (12 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (4 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (3 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (2 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (57 citations), Language and Linguistics (24 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (24 citations), Classics (5 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (6 citations). Tilmann Köppe has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Tom Kindt, Edgar Onea, Simone Winko and Thomas Weskott. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Literary Semantics, Zeitschrift für Germanistik, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and Semiotica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact