William R. Looft

37 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

William R. Looft
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 56
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 161
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 155
  • Gender Studies 108
  • Safety Research 92
Replace Qicheng Jing with:
Qicheng Jing China
Sharon Churnin Nash United States
Joseph L. Brown United States
Abraham J. Tannenbaum United States
Mary Louise Arnold Canada
Anne Sinclair Switzerland
Joan Freeman United Kingdom
Justin Aronfreed United States
Michael Basseches United States
Paul A. Roodin United States
William R. Looft relative to Qicheng Jing China Qicheng Jing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Qicheng Jing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William R. Looft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Looft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Looft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Looft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Looft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Looft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Looft. The network helps show where William R. Looft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside William R. Looft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William R. Looft Line = papers co-authored together William R. Looft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971144
2 197299
3 196948
4 197144
5 197344
6 197140
7 197131
8 197227
9 197126
10 197423
11 197122
12 197320
13 197118
14 197110
15 197310
16 196910
17 19736
18 19726
19 19726
20 19725

About William R. Looft

William R. Looft is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 689 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological and Educational Research Studies (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (56 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (161 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (155 citations), Gender Studies (108 citations) and Safety Research (92 citations). William R. Looft has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc D. Baranowski, Frank H. Hooper, Gerald R. Adams, William A. Stock, Joel R. Levin, Joseph C. LaVoie, Barbara B. Levin, Jack R. Rayman and Roger R. Eischens. Their work appears in journals such as The Gerontologist, Developmental Psychology, Human Development, Child Development and Journal of School Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact