William Pelz

1.5k citations
13 papers · 610 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Pelz

12 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

William Pelz
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computer Science Applications 135
  • Education 459
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 189
  • Communication 70
  • Social Psychology 104
Replace Toni Kempler Rogat with:
Toni Kempler Rogat United States
Ursula Stickler United Kingdom
Melissa Niiya United States
Tuike Iiskala Finland
Jaana Isohätälä Finland
Jyh Chong Liang Taiwan
Sanna Järvelä Finland
Judith G. Lambiotte United States
Amber Dailey–Hebert United States
Cathy Newman Thomas United States
William Pelz relative to Toni Kempler Rogat United States Toni Kempler Rogat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Toni Kempler Rogat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Pelz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Pelz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Pelz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Pelz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Pelz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Pelz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Pelz. The network helps show where William Pelz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside William Pelz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Pelz Line = papers co-authored together William Pelz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2000251
2
Measures of Learning Effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network
200187
3 201958
4
Course Design Factors Influencing the Success of Online Learning
200054
5 197350
6 201948
7 201931
8
ONLINE TEACHING AS A CATALYST FOR CLASSROOM-BASED INSTRUCTIONAL TRANSFORMATION
200219
9 20209
10 19741
11 19741
12
[2 or 4 daily doses of cimetidine in the treatment of gastric ulcer?].
19841
13 20170

About William Pelz

William Pelz is a scholar working on Education, Media Technology, Computer Science Applications, Social Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (3 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper) and Educational Innovations and Challenges (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (135 citations), Education (459 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (189 citations), Communication (70 citations) and Social Psychology (104 citations). William Pelz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Shea, Alexandra Pickett, Eric Fredericksen, Karen Swan, James C. Smith, Glayde Whitney, Lawrence Dugan, Herbert Hansen, Ryan McCabe and Chris Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Online Learning, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Physiology & Behavior, DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact