William E. Beane
Impact in
- General Psychology top 5%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience 2
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 2
-
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification 2
- Co-authors
- G. William Lucker (6 shared papers)Robert L. Helmreich (5 shared papers)Karen A. Matthews (3 shared papers)Janet T. Spence (2 shared papers)Walter G. Stephan (1 shared paper)Kenneth E. Guire (1 shared paper)James H. Korn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (3 papers)The Journal of Psychology (2 papers)Evaluation and Program Planning (1 paper)Journal of Educational Psychology (1 paper)Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William E. Beane
9 papers receiving 419 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- General Psychology 36
- Applied Psychology 65
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
- Social Psychology 140
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 46
Countries citing papers authored by William E. Beane
This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Beane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Beane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Beane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Beane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Beane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Beane. The network helps show where William E. Beane may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside William E. Beane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 219 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 76 | |
| 3 | 1980 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1981 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 45 | |
| 6 | 1971 | 27 | |
| 7 | The effects of belief similarity and ethnicity on liking and attributions for performance | 1978 | 5 |
| 8 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 1 |
About William E. Beane
William E. Beane is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (36 citations), Applied Psychology (65 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (144 citations), Social Psychology (140 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (46 citations). William E. Beane has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include G. William Lucker, Robert L. Helmreich, Karen A. Matthews, Janet T. Spence, Walter G. Stephan, Kenneth E. Guire and James H. Korn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, The Journal of Psychology, Evaluation and Program Planning, Journal of Educational Psychology and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.