Michael McCarrey

40 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Michael McCarrey
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Applied Psychology 52
  • Social Psychology 157
  • Clinical Psychology 146
  • Gender Studies 63
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 65
Replace Robert Smither with:
Robert Smither United States
Keith P. Sentis United States
Frank J. Atelsek United States
Linda A. Reed
Timothy W. Elig United States
David C. Lundgren United States
Richard E. Goranson Canada
Mitchell S. Nesler United States
Adelheid A. M. Nicol Canada
Jo-Ida C. Hansen United States
Michael McCarrey relative to Robert Smither United States Robert Smither's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Robert Smither · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael McCarrey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael McCarrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael McCarrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael McCarrey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael McCarrey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael McCarrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael McCarrey. The network helps show where Michael McCarrey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Michael McCarrey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael McCarrey Line = papers co-authored together Michael McCarrey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199891
2 200156
3 199732
4 197325
5 197321
6 197920
7 199220
8 198915
9 197415
10 198115
11 198614
12 198214
13 197713
14 198712
15 197812
16 197812
17 198312
18 198412
19 199410
20 19918

About Michael McCarrey

Michael McCarrey is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (52 citations), Social Psychology (157 citations), Clinical Psychology (146 citations), Gender Studies (63 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (65 citations). Michael McCarrey has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anna Baranowsky, Susan M. Johnson, Athena Xenikou, Adrian Furnham, Chantal Parent, Dwayne Schindler, Robert S. P. Jones, Peggy J. Kleinplatz, Jennifer Connolly and Richard Clément. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, Applied Psychology and The Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact