William D. Moore

17 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

William D. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Pharmaceutical Science 33
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 22
  • Immunology 79
  • Neurology 46
  • Insect Science 32
Replace Lili Huang with:
Lili Huang China
Michelle Chang United States
Tatsuya Ando Japan
Haihua Liu China
Rachel V. Floyd United Kingdom
Maria Bergström Sweden
D. P. Bruynzeel Netherlands
Suzzanne Owen Australia
Xinjuan Sun China
Jessica Cait Canada
William D. Moore relative to Lili Huang China Lili Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Lili Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William D. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Moore. The network helps show where William D. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William D. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William D. Moore Line = papers co-authored together William D. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199775
2 199273
3 198567
4 196836
5 200035
6
SHEET METAL FORMING TECHNOLOGY
196221
7 199319
8 195418
9
CELLULAR ACTIVITIES IN HYPERSENSITIVE REACTIONS. 3. SPECIFICALLY REACTIVE CELLS IN DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY: TUBERCULIN HYPERSENSITIVITY.
196414
10 198511
11 19648
12 20047
13 19915
14 19914
15 20082
16 19972
17
The phthisis still with us. Tuberculosis: the white plague is not yet a ghost of the past.
20011
18 20031
19 19541
20 19951

About William D. Moore

William D. Moore is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Pharmaceutical Science, Marketing, Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American History and Culture (3 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (2 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (1 paper) and Metallurgy and Material Forming (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (33 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (22 citations), Immunology (79 citations), Neurology (46 citations) and Insect Science (32 citations). William D. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include D. O. Wolfenbarger, John Barker, Melinda J. Haws, Richard E. Brown, John O. Kucan, Donald B. Calne, Mohit Bhatt, Bala V. Manyam, T Wegmann and Rosemarie Hunziker. Their work appears in journals such as The Public Historian, California Law Review, Journal of Heredity, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact