William D. Moore

16 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

William D. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Pharmaceutical Science 23
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 19
  • Immunology 77
  • Neurology 46
  • Nephrology 17
Replace Lili Huang with:
Lili Huang China
Jessica Cait Canada
Kamila Bendíčková Czechia
Ahmet Yaramış Türkiye
Nicholas Boire United States
Jianmei Tian China
Jun Gu China
Marcelo Alves Ferreira Brazil
Ahmed Ghoneim Egypt
Fiona Carter United Kingdom
William D. Moore relative to Lili Huang China Lili Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Lili Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William D. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Moore. The network helps show where William D. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William D. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William D. Moore Line = papers co-authored together William D. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199271
2 198565
3 199758
4 200033
5 196829
6 195416
7
SHEET METAL FORMING TECHNOLOGY
196215
8
CELLULAR ACTIVITIES IN HYPERSENSITIVE REACTIONS. 3. SPECIFICALLY REACTIVE CELLS IN DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY: TUBERCULIN HYPERSENSITIVITY.
196414
9 198511
10 19648
11 20047
12 19914
13 19914
14 19972
15 20082
16 19951
17 19981
18
The phthisis still with us. Tuberculosis: the white plague is not yet a ghost of the past.
20011
19 20031
20 19541

About William D. Moore

William D. Moore is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Pharmaceutical Science, Marketing, Spectroscopy and Oncology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (3 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper) and Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (23 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (19 citations), Immunology (77 citations), Neurology (46 citations) and Nephrology (17 citations). William D. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include D. O. Wolfenbarger, Richard E. Brown, Mohit Bhatt, Bala V. Manyam, John O. Kucan, Donald B. Calne, John Barker, Melinda J. Haws, Janet Rossant and Rosemarie Hunziker. Their work appears in journals such as The Public Historian, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Cellular Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact