The Public Historian

1.4k papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in The Public Historian in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in The Public Historian usually cover History (323 papers), Sociology and Political Science (289 papers) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (153 papers) specifically the topics of Oral History and Narratives in Research (235 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (151 papers) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Public Historian are Sarah Schrank, David Glassberg, Michelle Caswell, Nancy Raquel Mirabal, Otis L. Graham, Eric Gable, Hugh Davis Graham, Marjorie Senechal, Ronald J. Grele and James B. Gardner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Public Historian

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Public Historian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Public Historian.

Countries where authors publish in The Public Historian

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Public Historian. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Public Historian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Public Historian more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025