Richard E. Brown

284 papers receiving 10.0k citations

Peers

Richard E. Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 995
  • Sensory Systems 1.2k
  • Biological Psychiatry 372
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.1k
  • Social Psychology 2.1k
Replace Keith M. Kendrick with:
Keith M. Kendrick China
William W. Beatty United States
Fred W. Turek United States
Rae Silver United States
Enrico Alleva Italy
Randy J. Nelson United States
Victor H. Denenberg United States
Jeffrey M. Friedman United States
Michael T. Davis United States
Berend Olivier Netherlands
Richard E. Brown relative to Keith M. Kendrick China Keith M. Kendrick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Keith M. Kendrick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Brown. The network helps show where Richard E. Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard E. Brown Line = papers co-authored together Richard E. Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 301 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000461
2
Social odours in mammals
1985339
3 1979270
4 1987227
5 1999176
6 2004171
7 1970169
8 2005157
9 2015156
10 2007153
11 1969144
12 1987133
13 1997130
14 2009127
15 1994126
16 1970124
17 2002117
18 2013112
19 1995109
20 2009109

About Richard E. Brown

Richard E. Brown is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Molecular Biology, having authored 301 papers that have together received 10.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (49 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (35 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (31 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (30 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (20 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (18 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (995 citations), Sensory Systems (1.2k citations), Biological Psychiatry (372 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.1k citations) and Social Psychology (2.1k citations). Richard E. Brown has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Aimée A. Wong, Timothy P. O’Leary, Bruce Roser, Prim B. Singh, David W. Macdonald, Heather M. Schellinck, C.L. Davis, Kurt R. Stover, Anna W. Lee and Robert A. Weber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Behavioural Brain Research, Physiology & Behavior, Genes Brain & Behavior and Annals of Plastic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact