William D. Hicks

25 papers receiving 488 citations

Peers

William D. Hicks
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Applied Psychology 159
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 150
  • Political Science and International Relations 213
  • Communication 57
  • Gender Studies 57
Replace Molly B. Pepper with:
Molly B. Pepper United States
Cathrine Filstad Norway
Abdulfattah Yaghi United Arab Emirates
Rod P. Githens United States
Oliver McClellan United States
Darryl Dymock Australia
Lena Knappert Netherlands
John Kenneth White United States
Heewon Kim United States
William D. Hicks relative to Molly B. Pepper United States Molly B. Pepper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Molly B. Pepper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William D. Hicks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Hicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Hicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Hicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Hicks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Hicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Hicks. The network helps show where William D. Hicks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William D. Hicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William D. Hicks Line = papers co-authored together William D. Hicks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987165
2 201496
3 198144
4 201833
5 201629
6 198725
7
The process of entering training programs and its effects on training outcomes
198322
8 201818
9 201718
10 202017
11 201016
12 201715
13 201514
14 20169
15 19817
16 20214
17 20134
18 20243
19 20153
20 20202

About William D. Hicks

William D. Hicks is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Law and Gender Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (13 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (5 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (159 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (150 citations), Political Science and International Relations (213 citations), Communication (57 citations) and Gender Studies (57 citations). William D. Hicks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Lithuania. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Klimoski, Seth C. McKee, Daniel A. Smith, Jefferson E. Holcomb, Charles Stewart, Paul Gronke, Carl Klarner, Marian R. Williams, Tomislav V. Kovandzic and Melissa Alexander. Their work appears in journals such as PS Political Science & Politics, Academy of Management Journal, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, Political Research Quarterly and American Politics Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact