Daniel C. Lewis

71 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Daniel C. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Gender Studies 319
  • Social Psychology 418
  • Political Science and International Relations 374
  • Public Administration 38
  • Sociology and Political Science 407
Replace Dominik Vogel with:
Dominik Vogel Germany
Eric Shaw United States
Jan Kubı́k Czechia
Frederick Schauer United States
Brian Hudson United Kingdom
Charles E. Smith United States
Joshua Green United States
Joel Anderson Netherlands
Martin V. Day United States
Gary Edmond Australia
Daniel C. Lewis relative to Dominik Vogel Germany Dominik Vogel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.8×
Dominik Vogel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Lewis. The network helps show where Daniel C. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Lewis Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Lewis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017100
2 201778
3 201870
4 201762
5 201252
6 201052
7 201751
8 201743
9 202040
10
Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms and cerebral vasospasm.
199240
11 195839
12 199937
13 196135
14 201134
15 201132
16 201829
17
Narrowband channel characterization for Body Area Networks
200826
18 202224
19 201222
20 201718

About Daniel C. Lewis

Daniel C. Lewis is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management and Gender Studies, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (20 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (11 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (7 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (7 papers), Wireless Body Area Networks (3 papers) and Numerical methods for differential equations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (319 citations), Social Psychology (418 citations), Political Science and International Relations (374 citations), Public Administration (38 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (407 citations). Daniel C. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Jami K. Taylor, Donald P. Haider‐Markel, Andrew R. Flores, Patrick Miller, Barry L. Tadlock, Matthew L. Jacobsmeier, Saundra K. Schneider, William G. Jacoby, C. L. Dolph and J. Andrew Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as State Politics & Policy Quarterly, PS Political Science & Politics, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation and Interest Groups & Advocacy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact