Daniel A. Smith

102 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Daniel A. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Communication 583
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.6k
  • Public Administration 109
  • Gender Studies 262
  • Strategy and Management 391
Replace Thomas M. Holbrook with:
Thomas M. Holbrook United States
Jonathan Slapin United States
Pascal Sciarini Switzerland
Thad Kousser United States
Ernesto Calvo United States
Milada Anna Vachudová United States
Jan Rovný France
Adam Bonica United States
Simon Hug Switzerland
Thomas Gschwend Germany
Daniel A. Smith relative to Thomas M. Holbrook United States Thomas M. Holbrook's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
Thomas M. Holbrook · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Smith. The network helps show where Daniel A. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel A. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel A. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004172
2 2003132
3 2001121
4 2005115
5 201499
6 200181
7 200874
8 201462
9 200654
10 200954
11 201246
12 200846
13 200745
14 200536
15 201633
16 200232
17 200232
18 202032
19 200831
20 201330

About Daniel A. Smith

Daniel A. Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 116 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (78 papers), Social Media and Politics (24 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (24 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (16 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (13 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (12 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (11 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (583 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.6k citations), Public Administration (109 citations), Gender Studies (262 citations) and Strategy and Management (391 citations). Daniel A. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Caroline J. Tolbert, Michael C. Herron, Seth C. McKee, Ramona McNeal, William D. Hicks, Todd Donovan, Elizabeth Garrett, John C. Green, Hannah Walker and Daniel R. Biggers. Their work appears in journals such as American Politics Research, Political Research Quarterly, Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy, State Politics & Policy Quarterly and Electoral Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact