William D. Gray

62 papers receiving 778 citations

Peers

William D. Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Pharmacology 116
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 127
  • Plant Science 266
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 121
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 20
Replace Fumio Yagi with:
Fumio Yagi Japan
Jane E. Harris United Kingdom
Tadashi Nemoto Japan
Tomokazu Konishi Japan
Fumiko Suzuki Japan
Pranay Srivastava United States
Hiromu Matsumoto United States
Christopher Palmer United States
Kiyoshi Kimura Japan
Marnix Cokelaere Belgium
William D. Gray relative to Fumio Yagi Japan Fumio Yagi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Fumio Yagi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William D. Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Gray. The network helps show where William D. Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William D. Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William D. Gray Line = papers co-authored together William D. Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Biology of the Myxomycètes.
1968109
2 197064
3 197062
4 195161
5 196942
6 195334
7
The relation between monoamines in brain and the anticonvulsant action of inhibition of carbonic anhydrase.
197133
8 195630
9
Carbonic anhydrase inhibition. VII. Carbonic anhydrase inhibition and anticonvulsant effect.
195727
10 200127
11 196325
12 196324
13 200222
14 200321
15 196621
16 196720
17 196319
18 196618
19 197617
20 195815

About William D. Gray

William D. Gray is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Plant Science, Biomedical Engineering and Organic Chemistry, having authored 65 papers that have together received 950 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme function and inhibition (11 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (10 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (9 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (8 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (6 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (6 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (5 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (116 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (127 citations), Plant Science (266 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (121 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (20 citations). William D. Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and China. Frequent co-authors include Constantine J. Alexopoulos, Charles E. Rauh, Paul L. Munson, C. W. Hesseltine, Arnold C. Osterberg, Patrick V. C. Pinto, Karen Maex, D. R. Berry, Frank H. Smith and Thomas H. Maren. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mycologia, Economic Botany, Biochemical Pharmacology and American Journal of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact