Economic Botany

3.1k papers and 81.0k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Economic Botany in the last decades have received a total of 81.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Economic Botany usually cover Plant Science (1.5k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (594 papers) and Food Science (511 papers) specifically the topics of Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (421 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (256 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (214 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Economic Botany are Julia F. Morton, Charles R. Clément, Daniel F. Austin, Dorothea Bedigian, Richard Evans Schultes, Paul Gepts, Lytton J. Musselman, Jack R. Harlan, Oliver L. Phillips and Alwyn H. Gentry.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Economic Botany

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Economic Botany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Economic Botany.

Countries where authors publish in Economic Botany

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Economic Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Economic Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economic Botany more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026