W Reith

573 citations
31 papers · 443 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

W Reith

28 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

W Reith
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 144
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 84
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 45
  • Clinical Psychology 56
  • Surgery 77
Replace William J. Apfeldorf with:
William J. Apfeldorf United States
Hyeon-Jin Kim South Korea
Akira Imai Japan
Kayo Takahashi Japan
Kirsten Drejer Denmark
T. Wiegman Netherlands
Dušan T. Kanazir Serbia
H Simonnet France
H. D. Bruner United States
M. Sprong Netherlands
W Reith relative to William J. Apfeldorf United States William J. Apfeldorf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
William J. Apfeldorf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W Reith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W Reith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W Reith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W Reith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W Reith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W Reith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W Reith. The network helps show where W Reith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W Reith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W Reith Line = papers co-authored together W Reith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005131
2 1999100
3 197050
4 200021
5 195421
6 195411
7 195310
8 197010
9 196310
10 19549
11 19578
12 19617
13
A SPECIFIC SATURATION ASSAY TECHNIQUE FOR SERUM TRIIODOTHYRONINE.
19707
14 19676
15 19546
16 19566
17
Effectieve en duurzame implementatie in de jeugdzorg: Een literatuurrapportage over belemmerende en bevorderende factoren op implementatie van interventies in de jeugdzorg
20085
18 19644
19 19903
20 19583

About W Reith

W Reith is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Education and Cancer Research, having authored 31 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (144 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (84 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (45 citations), Clinical Psychology (56 citations) and Surgery (77 citations). W Reith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Bögels, Jens Kelm, B. L. Brown, A. Nabhan, F. Ahlhelm, Karsten Schwerdtfeger, W. I. Steudel, Roger Ekins, C. Morgan and René Gobbelé. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, The Lancet, Annals of Vascular Surgery and Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact