W. Patrick Hooper

529 citations
26 papers · 291 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

W. Patrick Hooper

22 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

W. Patrick Hooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Mathematical Physics 75
  • Atmospheric Science 137
  • Global and Planetary Change 160
  • Geometry and Topology 51
  • Theoretical Computer Science 5
Replace Peter J. Eccles with:
Peter J. Eccles United Kingdom
W. T. M. Verkley Netherlands
Olivier Pujol France
Jai Sukhatme India
Binson Joseph United States
M. Losada Colombia
Gualtiero Badin Germany
Robert D. Haskins United States
Hisanori Itoh Japan
Hyeong‐Bin Cheong South Korea
W. Patrick Hooper relative to Peter J. Eccles United Kingdom Peter J. Eccles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Peter J. Eccles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Patrick Hooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Patrick Hooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Patrick Hooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Patrick Hooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Patrick Hooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Patrick Hooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Patrick Hooper. The network helps show where W. Patrick Hooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside W. Patrick Hooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Patrick Hooper Line = papers co-authored together W. Patrick Hooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986144
2 201220
3 201317
4 201512
5 200711
6 20009
7 20137
8
Billiards in Nearly Isosceles Triangles
20127
9 20107
10 20097
11 20127
12 19966
13 19996
14 19865
15 19885
16 20125
17 19994
18 20204
19
On the stability of periodic billiard paths in triangles
20063
20 20052

About W. Patrick Hooper

W. Patrick Hooper is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (12 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (8 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (6 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (4 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (4 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (4 papers), Aeolian processes and effects (4 papers) and Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (75 citations), Atmospheric Science (137 citations), Global and Planetary Change (160 citations), Geometry and Topology (51 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations). W. Patrick Hooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include E. W. Eloranta, Barak Weiss, Pascal Hubert, H. Gerber, Richard Evan Schwartz, Richard J. Lind, P. A. Durkee, K. Nielsen, R. F. Gasparovic and Edward E. Hindman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Modern Dynamics, Geometriae Dedicata, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Geometry & Topology and Annales de l’institut Fourier.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact