Tyson E. Lewis

119 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Tyson E. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Philosophy 333
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 106
  • Education 480
  • Cultural Studies 133
  • Sociology and Political Science 518
Replace Inna Semetsky with:
Inna Semetsky Australia
Derek R. Ford United States
Patrick Slattery United States
Graham Badley United Kingdom
Paul Standish United Kingdom
John Dewey France
David T. Hansen United States
Eileen Honan Australia
Hilary Janks South Africa
Sarah E. Truman Australia
Tyson E. Lewis relative to Inna Semetsky Australia Inna Semetsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.4×
Inna Semetsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tyson E. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tyson E. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tyson E. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tyson E. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tyson E. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tyson E. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tyson E. Lewis. The network helps show where Tyson E. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Tyson E. Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tyson E. Lewis Line = papers co-authored together Tyson E. Lewis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 138 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013138
2 201055
3 201151
4 200640
5 201138
6 200335
7
Education Out of Bounds: Reimagining Cultural Studies for a Posthuman Age
201034
8 201234
9 201529
10
Inoperative Learning: A Radical Rewriting of Educational Potentialities
201723
11 201422
12 201622
13 201420
14 200920
15 201520
16 200519
17 201219
18 200718
19 201517
20 201017

About Tyson E. Lewis

Tyson E. Lewis is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Education, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 138 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (40 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (29 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (15 papers), Art Education and Development (13 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (13 papers), Critical Theory and Political Philosophy (11 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (11 papers) and Political theory and Gramsci (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (333 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (106 citations), Education (480 citations), Cultural Studies (133 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (518 citations). Tyson E. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include R. Kahn, Richard Kahn, Daniel Cho, Douglas Kellner, Amelia M. Kraehe, Derek R. Ford, Joris Vlieghe, Peter Hyland, Alberto Toscano and Jaime Grinberg. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Philosophy and Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Educational Theory, The Review of Education Pedagogy & Cultural Studies and Cultural Critique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact