Tricia M. Wright

12 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Tricia M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 191
  • Sensory Systems 64
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 214
  • Aging 16
  • Cancer Research 48
Replace Agnieszka M. Janisiewicz with:
Agnieszka M. Janisiewicz United States
Sruthi K. Swaminathan United States
C Aubert France
Nofar Mor Israel
Ga‐Ram Hwang United States
Michinori Koebis Japan
Carli K. Opland United States
Kamila Maria Jozwik United Kingdom
Reenal Pattni United States
Vincent C. W. Sun Canada
Tricia M. Wright relative to Agnieszka M. Janisiewicz United States Agnieszka M. Janisiewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.7×
Agnieszka M. Janisiewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tricia M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tricia M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tricia M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tricia M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tricia M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tricia M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tricia M. Wright. The network helps show where Tricia M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tricia M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tricia M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Tricia M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2003241
2 200999
3 201952
4 201138
5 201436
6 200529
7 201024
8 201324
9 201423
10 200522
11 20201
12 20191

About Tricia M. Wright

Tricia M. Wright is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Aging, having authored 12 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal cell carcinoma treatment (4 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (3 papers), Renal and related cancers (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (191 citations), Sensory Systems (64 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (214 citations), Aging (16 citations) and Cancer Research (48 citations). Tricia M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Kimryn Rathmell, Angela Wenning, Ronald L. Calabrese, Brian J. Norris, Brian I. Rini, Angela Rose Brannon, Eric Wallen, Amanda J. Mikels, John Dozier Gordan and Caroline Anne Mitchell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Molecular Biology of the Cell, Cerebral Cortex, Molecular Cancer Research and Cell Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact