Countries where authors publish in Molecular Cancer Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Cancer Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Cancer Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Cancer Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Molecular Cancer Research
This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Cancer Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Cancer Research.
About Molecular Cancer Research
The 2.9k papers published in Molecular Cancer Research in the last decades have received a total of 136.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Molecular Cancer Research usually cover Cancer Research (641 papers), Oncology (867 papers), Molecular Biology (1.8k papers), Immunology and Allergy (150 papers) and Cell Biology (304 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (268 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (229 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (180 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (166 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (158 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (157 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (151 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (150 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Cancer Research are Josep M. Tabernero, Paul A. Marks, Milos Dokmanovic, Chuanshu Huang, Weiming Ouyang, Haitian Lu, Ute Martha Moll, Waldemar Debinski, Gerhard Christofori and Neda Slade.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.