Countries where authors publish in Molecular Cancer Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Cancer Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Cancer Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Cancer Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Molecular Cancer Research
This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Cancer Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Cancer Research.
About Molecular Cancer Research
The 3.0k papers published in Molecular Cancer Research in the last decades have received a total of 126.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Molecular Cancer Research usually cover Cancer Research (666 papers), Oncology (892 papers), Molecular Biology (1.8k papers), Immunology and Allergy (149 papers) and Cell Biology (315 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (277 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (227 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (183 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (174 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (164 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (163 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (157 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (149 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Cancer Research are Josep Tabernero, Paul A. Marks, Milos Dokmanovic, Chuanshu Huang, Weiming Ouyang, Haitian Lu, Ute M. Moll, Waldemar Debinski, Neda Slade and Gerhard Christofori.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.