Countries where authors publish in Molecular Cancer Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Cancer Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Cancer Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Cancer Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Molecular Cancer Research
This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Cancer Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Cancer Research.
About Molecular Cancer Research
The 3k papers published in Molecular Cancer Research in the last decades have received a total of 137.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Molecular Cancer Research usually cover Cancer Research (519 papers), Oncology (736 papers), Molecular Biology (1.3k papers), Genetics (138 papers) and Cell Biology (186 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Cells and Metastasis (201 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (184 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (169 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (121 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (121 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (117 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (113 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Cancer Research are Josep M. Tabernero, Milos Dokmanovic, Paul A. Marks, Chuanshu Huang, Weiming Ouyang, Haitian Lu, Ute Martha Moll, Waldemar Debinski, Gerhard Christofori and Neda Slade.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.